Syndetics cover image
Image from Syndetics

Knowing the score : what sports can teach us about philosophy (and what philosophy can teach us about sports) / David Papineau.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: New York, NY : Basic Books, [2017]Description: viii, 285 pages ; 24 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9780465049684 (hardback)
  • 0465049680 (hardback)
Subject(s):
Contents:
Part I : Focus. Having your mind right -- In the blink of an eye -- Choking and the yips -- Part II : Rules. Professional fouls and political obligation -- Morality, convention, and soccer fakery -- Cads of the most unscrupulous kidney -- Part III : Teams. The logic of fandom -- Sporting teams, spacetime worms, and Israeli soccer -- Mutualism and the art of road cycle racing -- Game theory and team reasoning -- Part IV : Tribes. Civil society and sporting eligibility -- Sporting nations and political geography -- Race, ethnicity, and joining the club -- Nature, nurture,a nd sporting families -- Part V : Values. Amateur values and ulterior motives -- The Coase theorem and sporting capitalism -- History, tradition, and the meaning of football -- Shankly, Chomsky, and the nature of sport.
Summary: "In Knowing the Score, philosopher David Papineau explores what philosophy can teach us about sports, and what sports can teach us about philosophy. Beginning with various sporting questions and challenges, Papineau digs into modern philosophy's most perplexing questions. For instance, he discusses drafting techniques in cycling to shed new light on questions of altruism, and examines cricket family "dynasties" to help broaden the debate over nature v. nurture. When Papineau began writing this book, he thought he could illuminate sports by viewing it through a philosophical lens. But the more he wrote, the more he realized that it was the other way around - the study of sports clarifies, challenges, and sometimes confuses crucial issues in philosophy. Why do sports competitors choke? How can Roger Federer select which shot to play in 400 milliseconds? Why do fans think God will favor their team over their rivals? Why does motor racing, but not football, run in families? How can it be moral to deceive the umpire by framing a pitch? From all of these questions, and many more, philosophy has a great deal to learn. An entertaining and erudite book that ranges far and wide through the sporting world, Knowing the Score is perfect reading for armchair philosophers and Monday morning quarterbacks alike"-- Provided by publisher.
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Adult Book Adult Book Main Library NonFiction 796.01 P217 Available 33111008842797
Total holds: 0

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

In Knowing the Score , philosopher David Papineau uses sports to illuminate some of modern philosophy's most perplexing questions. As Papineau demonstrates, the study of sports clarifies, challenges, and sometimes confuses crucial issues in philosophy. The tactics of road bicycle racing shed new light on questions of altruism, while sporting family dynasties reorient the nature v. nurture debate. Why do sports competitors choke? Why do fans think God will favor their team over their rivals? How can it be moral to deceive the umpire by framing a pitch? From all of these questions, and many more, philosophy has a great deal to learn.

An entertaining and erudite book that ranges far and wide through the sporting world, Knowing the Score is perfect reading for armchair philosophers and Monday morning quarterbacks alike.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

"In Knowing the Score, philosopher David Papineau explores what philosophy can teach us about sports, and what sports can teach us about philosophy. Beginning with various sporting questions and challenges, Papineau digs into modern philosophy's most perplexing questions. For instance, he discusses drafting techniques in cycling to shed new light on questions of altruism, and examines cricket family "dynasties" to help broaden the debate over nature v. nurture. When Papineau began writing this book, he thought he could illuminate sports by viewing it through a philosophical lens. But the more he wrote, the more he realized that it was the other way around - the study of sports clarifies, challenges, and sometimes confuses crucial issues in philosophy. Why do sports competitors choke? How can Roger Federer select which shot to play in 400 milliseconds? Why do fans think God will favor their team over their rivals? Why does motor racing, but not football, run in families? How can it be moral to deceive the umpire by framing a pitch? From all of these questions, and many more, philosophy has a great deal to learn. An entertaining and erudite book that ranges far and wide through the sporting world, Knowing the Score is perfect reading for armchair philosophers and Monday morning quarterbacks alike"-- Provided by publisher.

Part I : Focus. Having your mind right -- In the blink of an eye -- Choking and the yips -- Part II : Rules. Professional fouls and political obligation -- Morality, convention, and soccer fakery -- Cads of the most unscrupulous kidney -- Part III : Teams. The logic of fandom -- Sporting teams, spacetime worms, and Israeli soccer -- Mutualism and the art of road cycle racing -- Game theory and team reasoning -- Part IV : Tribes. Civil society and sporting eligibility -- Sporting nations and political geography -- Race, ethnicity, and joining the club -- Nature, nurture,a nd sporting families -- Part V : Values. Amateur values and ulterior motives -- The Coase theorem and sporting capitalism -- History, tradition, and the meaning of football -- Shankly, Chomsky, and the nature of sport.

Powered by Koha