Syndetics cover image
Image from Syndetics

Evil in modern thought : an alternative history of philosophy / Susan Neiman ; [with a new preface by the author].

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2004.Description: xx, 358 p. ; 24 cmISBN:
  • 0691117926
  • 9780691117928
Subject(s):
Contents:
FIRE FROM HEAVEN -- God's advocates : Leibniz and Pope -- Newton of the mind : Jean-Jacques Rousseau -- Divided wisdom : Immanuel Kant -- real and rational : Hegel and Marx -- In conclusion -- CONDEMNING THE ARCHITECT -- Raw material : Bayle's Dictionary -- Voltaire's Destinies -- The impotence of reason : David Hume -- End of the tunnel : the Marquis de Sade -- Schopenhauer : the world as tribunal -- ENDS OF AN ILLUSION -- Eternal choices : Nietzsche on redemption -- On consolation : Freud vs. providence -- HOMELESS -- Earthquakes : why Lisbon? -- Mass murders : why Auschwitz? -- Losses : ending modern theodicies -- Intentions : meaning and malice -- Terror : after September 11 -- Remains : Camus, Arendt, critical theory, Rawls -- Origins : sufficient reason.
Summary: Evil threatens human reason, for it challenges our hope that the world makes sense. For eighteenth-century Europeans, the Lisbon earthquake was manifest evil. Today we view evil as a matter of human cruelty, and Auschwitz as its extreme incarnation. Examining our understanding of evil from the Inquisition to contemporary terrorism, Susan Neiman explores who we have become in the three centuries that separate us from the early Enlightenment. In the process, she rewrites the history of modern thought and points philosophy back to the questions that originally animated it. Whether expressed in theological or secular terms, evil poses a problem about the world's intelligibility. It confronts philosophy with fundamental questions: Can there be meaning in a world where innocents suffer? Can belief in divine power or human progress survive a cataloging of evil? Is evil profound or banal? Neiman argues that these questions impelled modern philosophy. Traditional philosophers from Leibniz to Hegel sought to defend the Creator of a world containing evil. Inevitably, their efforts--combined with those of more literary figures like Pope, Voltaire, and the Marquis de Sade--eroded belief in God's benevolence, power, and relevance, until Nietzsche claimed He had been murdered. They also yielded the distinction between natural and moral evil that we now take for granted. Neiman turns to consider philosophy's response to the Holocaust as a final moral evil, concluding that two basic stances run through modern thought. One, from Rousseau to Arendt, insists that morality demands we make evil intelligible. The other, from Voltaire to Adorno, insists that morality demands that we don't. --From publisher's description.
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Adult Book Adult Book Main Library NonFiction 170 N414 Available 33111006981167
Total holds: 0

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

Evil threatens human reason, for it challenges our hope that the world makes sense. For eighteenth-century Europeans, the Lisbon earthquake was manifest evil. Today we view evil as a matter of human cruelty, and Auschwitz as its extreme incarnation. Examining our understanding of evil from the Inquisition to contemporary terrorism, Susan Neiman explores who we have become in the three centuries that separate us from the early Enlightenment. In the process, she rewrites the history of modern thought and points philosophy back to the questions that originally animated it.

Whether expressed in theological or secular terms, evil poses a problem about the world's intelligibility. It confronts philosophy with fundamental questions: Can there be meaning in a world where innocents suffer? Can belief in divine power or human progress survive a cataloging of evil? Is evil profound or banal? Neiman argues that these questions impelled modern philosophy. Traditional philosophers from Leibniz to Hegel sought to defend the Creator of a world containing evil. Inevitably, their efforts--combined with those of more literary figures like Pope, Voltaire, and the Marquis de Sade--eroded belief in God's benevolence, power, and relevance, until Nietzsche claimed He had been murdered. They also yielded the distinction between natural and moral evil that we now take for granted. Neiman turns to consider philosophy's response to the Holocaust as a final moral evil, concluding that two basic stances run through modern thought. One, from Rousseau to Arendt, insists that morality demands we make evil intelligible. The other, from Voltaire to Adorno, insists that morality demands that we don't.

Beautifully written and thoroughly engaging, this book tells the history of modern philosophy as an attempt to come to terms with evil. It reintroduces philosophy to anyone interested in questions of life and death, good and evil, suffering and sense.

Includes bibliographical references (p. [337]-343) and index.

FIRE FROM HEAVEN -- God's advocates : Leibniz and Pope -- Newton of the mind : Jean-Jacques Rousseau -- Divided wisdom : Immanuel Kant -- real and rational : Hegel and Marx -- In conclusion -- CONDEMNING THE ARCHITECT -- Raw material : Bayle's Dictionary -- Voltaire's Destinies -- The impotence of reason : David Hume -- End of the tunnel : the Marquis de Sade -- Schopenhauer : the world as tribunal -- ENDS OF AN ILLUSION -- Eternal choices : Nietzsche on redemption -- On consolation : Freud vs. providence -- HOMELESS -- Earthquakes : why Lisbon? -- Mass murders : why Auschwitz? -- Losses : ending modern theodicies -- Intentions : meaning and malice -- Terror : after September 11 -- Remains : Camus, Arendt, critical theory, Rawls -- Origins : sufficient reason.

Evil threatens human reason, for it challenges our hope that the world makes sense. For eighteenth-century Europeans, the Lisbon earthquake was manifest evil. Today we view evil as a matter of human cruelty, and Auschwitz as its extreme incarnation. Examining our understanding of evil from the Inquisition to contemporary terrorism, Susan Neiman explores who we have become in the three centuries that separate us from the early Enlightenment. In the process, she rewrites the history of modern thought and points philosophy back to the questions that originally animated it. Whether expressed in theological or secular terms, evil poses a problem about the world's intelligibility. It confronts philosophy with fundamental questions: Can there be meaning in a world where innocents suffer? Can belief in divine power or human progress survive a cataloging of evil? Is evil profound or banal? Neiman argues that these questions impelled modern philosophy. Traditional philosophers from Leibniz to Hegel sought to defend the Creator of a world containing evil. Inevitably, their efforts--combined with those of more literary figures like Pope, Voltaire, and the Marquis de Sade--eroded belief in God's benevolence, power, and relevance, until Nietzsche claimed He had been murdered. They also yielded the distinction between natural and moral evil that we now take for granted. Neiman turns to consider philosophy's response to the Holocaust as a final moral evil, concluding that two basic stances run through modern thought. One, from Rousseau to Arendt, insists that morality demands we make evil intelligible. The other, from Voltaire to Adorno, insists that morality demands that we don't. --From publisher's description.

Powered by Koha