000 03265cam a2200433 i 4500
001 on1003311466
003 OCoLC
005 20180917020908.0
008 180126t20182018nyua b 001 0 eng c
010 _a 2017056458
040 _aOU/DLC
_beng
_erda
_cDLC
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCF
_dOCLCQ
_dTOH
_dJRZ
_dYDX
_dJTH
_dWLU
_dOCLCQ
_dILC
_dOBE
_dDLC
_dUCW
_dT3L
_dCUY
_dVP@
_dBUDAP
_dCHVBK
_dIDU
_dOCLCQ
_dNDB
_dOCLCO
_dNFG
019 _a1034001348
020 _a9780465097609
_q(hardcover)
020 _a046509760X
_q(hardcover)
020 _z0465097618
024 8 _a99977225318
035 _a(OCoLC)1003311466
_z(OCoLC)1034001348
042 _apcc
092 _a501
_bP359
049 _aNFGA
100 1 _aPearl, Judea,
_eauthor.
_9367094
245 1 4 _aThe book of why :
_bthe new science of cause and effect /
_cJudea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie.
250 _aFirst edition.
264 1 _aNew York, NY :
_bBasic Books,
_c[2018]
264 4 _c©2018
300 _ax, 418 pages :
_billustrations ;
_c25 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
500 _a"May 2018"--Title page verso.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 373-404) and index.
505 0 _aIntroduction : Mind over data -- The ladder of causation -- From buccaneers to guinea pigs : the genesis of causal inference -- From evidence to causes : Reverend Bayes meets Mr. Holmes -- Confounding and deconfounding : or, slaying the lurking variable -- The smoke-filled debate : clearing the air -- Paradoxes galore! -- Beyond adjustment : the conquest of Mount Intervention -- Counterfactuals : mining worlds that could have been -- Mediation : the search for a mechanism -- Big data, artificial intelligence, and the big questions.
520 _a"Everyone has heard the claim, "Correlation does not imply causation." What might sound like a reasonable dictum metastasized in the twentieth century into one of science's biggest obstacles, as a legion of researchers became unwilling to make the claim that one thing could cause another. Even two decades ago, asking a statistician a question like "Was it the aspirin that stopped my headache?" would have been like asking if he believed in voodoo, or at best a topic for conversation at a cocktail party rather than a legitimate target of scientific inquiry. Scientists were allowed to posit only that the probability that one thing was associated with another. This all changed with Judea Pearl, whose work on causality was not just a victory for common sense, but a revolution in the study of the world"--
_cProvided by publisher.
520 _a"Correlation is not causation"--This was one of the standards of scientific belief for a century. Now Pearl and his colleagues establish causality--the study of cause and effect--on a firm scientific basis. Causality doesn't just enable us to know not just whether one thing causes another: it lets us explore the world that is and the worlds that could have been. It is not just a victory for common sense, but a revolution in the study of the world.--adapted from dust jacket.
650 0 _aCausation.
_952534
650 0 _aInference.
_9369329
700 1 _aMackenzie, Dana,
_eauthor.
_9369330
994 _aC0
_bNFG
999 _c279064
_d279064