000 | 03265cam a2200433 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | on1003311466 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20180917020908.0 | ||
008 | 180126t20182018nyua b 001 0 eng c | ||
010 | _a 2017056458 | ||
040 |
_aOU/DLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dOCLCO _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dTOH _dJRZ _dYDX _dJTH _dWLU _dOCLCQ _dILC _dOBE _dDLC _dUCW _dT3L _dCUY _dVP@ _dBUDAP _dCHVBK _dIDU _dOCLCQ _dNDB _dOCLCO _dNFG |
||
019 | _a1034001348 | ||
020 |
_a9780465097609 _q(hardcover) |
||
020 |
_a046509760X _q(hardcover) |
||
020 | _z0465097618 | ||
024 | 8 | _a99977225318 | |
035 |
_a(OCoLC)1003311466 _z(OCoLC)1034001348 |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
092 |
_a501 _bP359 |
||
049 | _aNFGA | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPearl, Judea, _eauthor. _9367094 |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe book of why : _bthe new science of cause and effect / _cJudea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie. |
250 | _aFirst edition. | ||
264 | 1 |
_aNew York, NY : _bBasic Books, _c[2018] |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2018 | |
300 |
_ax, 418 pages : _billustrations ; _c25 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
500 | _a"May 2018"--Title page verso. | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 373-404) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction : Mind over data -- The ladder of causation -- From buccaneers to guinea pigs : the genesis of causal inference -- From evidence to causes : Reverend Bayes meets Mr. Holmes -- Confounding and deconfounding : or, slaying the lurking variable -- The smoke-filled debate : clearing the air -- Paradoxes galore! -- Beyond adjustment : the conquest of Mount Intervention -- Counterfactuals : mining worlds that could have been -- Mediation : the search for a mechanism -- Big data, artificial intelligence, and the big questions. | |
520 |
_a"Everyone has heard the claim, "Correlation does not imply causation." What might sound like a reasonable dictum metastasized in the twentieth century into one of science's biggest obstacles, as a legion of researchers became unwilling to make the claim that one thing could cause another. Even two decades ago, asking a statistician a question like "Was it the aspirin that stopped my headache?" would have been like asking if he believed in voodoo, or at best a topic for conversation at a cocktail party rather than a legitimate target of scientific inquiry. Scientists were allowed to posit only that the probability that one thing was associated with another. This all changed with Judea Pearl, whose work on causality was not just a victory for common sense, but a revolution in the study of the world"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
520 | _a"Correlation is not causation"--This was one of the standards of scientific belief for a century. Now Pearl and his colleagues establish causality--the study of cause and effect--on a firm scientific basis. Causality doesn't just enable us to know not just whether one thing causes another: it lets us explore the world that is and the worlds that could have been. It is not just a victory for common sense, but a revolution in the study of the world.--adapted from dust jacket. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aCausation. _952534 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aInference. _9369329 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aMackenzie, Dana, _eauthor. _9369330 |
|
994 |
_aC0 _bNFG |
||
999 |
_c279064 _d279064 |