000			03920cam a2200445 i 4500
001			on1196821998
003			OCoLC
005			20210914134047.0
008			200910t20212021nyu b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2020041623
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dBDX _dYDX _dUKMGB _dYDX _dOCLCO _dYUS _dPAU _dNFG
015			_aGBC198810 _2bnb
016	7		_a020235631 _2Uk
020			_a9781479808663 _qhardcover
020			_a1479808660 _qhardcover
020			_a9781479808687 _qpaperback
020			_a1479808687 _qpaperback
024	8		_a40030665986
035			_a(OCoLC)1196821998
042			_apcc
043			_an-us---
092			_a277.3083 _bY21
049			_aNFGA
100	1		_aYancey, George A., _d1962- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aOne faith no longer : _bthe transformation of Christianity in red and blue America / _cGeorge Yancey and Ashlee Quosigk.
264		1	_aNew York : _bNew York University Press, _c[2021]
264		4	_c©2021
300			_axi, 291 pages ; _c23 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520			_a"This book investigates how conservative and progressive Christians use their political attitudes and theological beliefs to define their social outgroups and shape their social identities. The core question is the role political and theological values play in the construction of the social identities of conservative and progressive Christians and how those values help members of each group find answers to questions of meaning. The bottom line the authors seek to illuminate in this book is that Progressive and Conservative Christians use entirely different factors in determining their social identity and moral values and we articulate ways in which they differ. The authors utilize a mixed methods approach to explore this question. They highlight how Progressive Christians, whom rely on what we call a Humanistic Ethic of Social Justice, emphasize political values relating to social justice issues as they determine who is part of their in-group, and tend to be less concerned about theological agreement. Conservative Christians, on the other hand, rely on a historical theology emphasizing biblical doctrines, and do not put strong emphasis on political agreement as they determine if you are one of them-their major concern is whether you agree with them on core theological points. This helps answer the question about the nature of the theological divide within Christianity and the degree to which this disagreement leads to distinctive religious groups. Indeed, the authors argue that the way these two groups deal with questions of meaning are so opposed that it is time to regard them as distinct religious groups rather than subgroups under a single religious umbrella. By examining the data, the authors argue that the divide between theologically progressive and conservative Christians is so great that one can realistically think of them as different religious groups"-- _cProvided by publisher.
505	0	0	_aMachine generated contents note: _g1. _tThe History of the Modernist-Fundamentalist Conflict -- _g2. _tPolitics and the American Christian -- _g3. _tI Am Pro-life but -- _g4. _tIn or Out? How Christians Justify Their Acceptance or Rejection of Believers with Differing Faiths -- _g5. _tConservative Christians as Theologically Rigid and Socially Diverse -- _g6. _tProgressive Christians as Theologically Flexible and Politically Optimistic -- _g7. _tBoundaries of Progressive Christians' Social Identities -- _g8. _tDo Red and Blue Christians Belong Together?.
651		0	_aUnited States _xChurch history _y21st century. _917699
650		0	_aChristianity _zUnited States. _9134636
650		0	_aChristianity and politics _zUnited States. _986390
700	1		_aQuosigk, Ashlee, _eauthor.
994			_aC0 _bNFG
999			_c335192 _d335192